Home > News > Ethical implications of new science
February 19th, 2007
Ethical implications of new science
News of Edinburgh scientists' potential cure for Rett syndrome - a physically damaging form of autism - might have raised a few more eyebrows in international press this week had what it actually proposes been made more explicit. That is, any eventual treatment developed would involve the genetic modification of humans.
And if the week's headlines are to be believed, humans may be in for a large helping of modification: a "bionic" eye which connects directly to the optic nerve, a process of shifting around heart cells to repair heart disease or a breakthrough in nanotechnology. So it seems odd that, in a week which has had science journals so excited, the tabloid media who usually most enjoy whipping up a palaver about meddling with our perfect form have given in without so much as a whimper.
PETA science consortium to present at Society for Risk Analysis meeting December 10th, 2014
PETA science consortium experts to present at international nanotechology workshop: PETA International Science Consortium, Ltd., Is a Sponsor of Nano Risk Analysis II September 12th, 2014
PETA science consortium to present hazard testing strategy at nanotoxicology meeting: High tech field ripe for use of sophisticated non-animal testing strategies April 22nd, 2014
Scientists disagree on responsible research April 8th, 2014
2015 Nanonics Image Contest January 29th, 2015
OCSiAl supports NanoART Imagery Contest January 23rd, 2015
EnvisioNano: An image contest hosted by the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) January 22nd, 2015
Oxford Instruments Asylum Research Announces AFM Image Contest Winners January 11th, 2015