Home > News > Not enough talk about ethics and nanosciences
September 18th, 2007
Not enough talk about ethics and nanosciences
This is all very well but what are the main ethical dangers posed by nanoscience and nanotechnologies? The Commission does not want to go there at all and makes no serious mention. Web hunting, however, throws up some sinister applications including dramatic improvements in surveillance devices, new weaponry as the basis for "nano-terrorism" and still-to-be-understood environmental impacts of such things as "fullerenes" and "carbon nanotubes". And how acceptable will technologies such as implantable cells and sensors be to most of us?
When it eventually produces its Code of Conduct, I hope the Commission will help us to understand whether and how it will help to build a few defences against the perverse use of these new technologies.
PETA science consortium to present at Society for Risk Analysis meeting December 10th, 2014
PETA science consortium experts to present at international nanotechology workshop: PETA International Science Consortium, Ltd., Is a Sponsor of Nano Risk Analysis II September 12th, 2014
PETA science consortium to present hazard testing strategy at nanotoxicology meeting: High tech field ripe for use of sophisticated non-animal testing strategies April 22nd, 2014
Scientists disagree on responsible research April 8th, 2014
Interviews/Book Reviews/Essays/Reports/Podcasts/Journals/White papers
Quantum teleportation on a chip: A significant step towards ultra-high speed quantum computers April 1st, 2015
So, near and yet so far: Stable HGNs for Raman April 1st, 2015
Two-dimensional dirac materials: Structure, properties, and rarity April 1st, 2015
3-D neural structure guided with biocompatible nanofiber scaffolds and hydrogels April 1st, 2015