- About Us
- Career Center
- Nano-Social Network
- Nano Consulting
- My Account
June 15th, 2005
Mike Treder: So, if the U.S. and other governments were to earmark 10% of their nanotech funding for environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks, would that be enough? Would it satisfy CRN's concerns?
Not even close.
Unfortunately, that will not take us even halfway to where we need to go. At least two separate sets of studies are needed.
|Related News Press|
PETA science consortium to present at Society for Risk Analysis meeting December 10th, 2014
Scientists disagree on responsible research April 8th, 2014
Preparing for Nano
Durnham University's DEEPEN project comes to a close September 26th, 2012
Technical Seminar at ANFoS 2012 August 22nd, 2012
Nanotechnology shows we can innovate without economic growth April 12th, 2012
Thailand to host NanoThailand 2012 December 18th, 2011