- About Us
- Career Center
- Nano-Social Network
- Nano Consulting
- My Account
January 20th, 2010
Chris Mooney: As Science and Engineering Indicators 2010 itself admits, seeing how the country fares on science in comparison with other nations isn't the only possible means of judgment. If one's standard is more ambitious—emphasizing, in the latest report's words, "what a technologically advanced society requires (either today or in the future) to compete in the world economy and enable its citizens to better take advantage of science progress in their own lives"—then it is very hard to feel good about the current state of affairs in the United States.
For instance, just 13 percent of the public now claims to follow science and technology news "very closely," and this number has been on a downward trend for the past decade, ending with the current low. So while Americans may profess great admiration for science in the abstract, they hardly feel compelled to pay it much attention.
Similarly, there has been little apparent improvement over time in Americans' basic ability to answer factual questions about science correctly. Moreover, the vast majority of our citizens have scant familiarity with key emerging scientific fields that will dramatically shape the future, such as nanotechnology and biotechnology—and it is important to note that these are the only such fields that the NSF report focuses in on. Ask Americans about other coming scientific technologies or quandaries—say, geoengineering, or synthetic biology—and I imagine the responses would be even more dismal.
|Related News Press|
News and information
Attosecond physics: A switch for light-wave electronics May 24th, 2016
Graphene: Progress, not quantum leaps May 23rd, 2016
Albertan Science Lab Opens in India May 7th, 2016
Nanoscale Trojan horses treat inflammation May 24th, 2016
Programmable materials find strength in molecular repetition May 23rd, 2016