- About Us
- Career Center
- Nano-Social Network
- Nano Consulting
- My Account
December 3rd, 2007
Devil and the Deep Blue Sea?
Scientists instinctively love nanotechnology, which is why they shouldn't be in charge of it.
What is troubling here is that nanotechnology, being embraced the world over as the panacea for all that ails the way our materials work or our drugs react in the body, is being utilized in ways that at the very least could be described as reckless or, at the worst, harmful to the public perception and the progress of these technologies. The long-term implications of releasing ZVI into the oceans are not known. How will the currents carry these particles? How long and to what effect will the iron affect plankton plumes? What kind of warnings do we put on the houses of people living with paints with nanoparticles in them or whose walls of their homes are made of nanocomposites? Could these nanocomposites become the asbestos or lead for the 21st century?
|Related News Press|
Interviews/Book Reviews/Essays/Reports/Podcasts/Journals/White papers
Using DNA origami to build nanodevices of the future September 1st, 2015
Nanotech could rid cattle of ticks, with less collateral damage September 1st, 2015
Scientists 'squeeze' light one particle at a time: A team of scientists have measured a bizarre effect in quantum physics, in which individual particles of light are said to have been 'squeezed' -- an achievement which at least one textbook had written off as hopeless September 1st, 2015
Sustainable nanotechnology center September 1st, 2015