- About Us
- Career Center
- Nano-Social Network
- Nano Consulting
- My Account
September 1st, 2006
But is nanotech getting an unfairly bad rap? Manipulation of materials at the nano level has potentially ground-breaking applications for medicine, for example, and some scientists worry that one of the industry's biggest challenges will be overcoming its PR problem.
To get to the heart of the issue, we talked to two experts on opposing sides of the debate. Hope Shand, research director of Ontario-based human rights organization ETC Group has called for a worldwide moratorium on nanotech until the full scope of the technology, and its risks, can be understood. Christine Peterson is founder and VP of Public Policy for the Foresight Institute, a think-tank in Menlo Park, CA dedicated to the beneficial implementation of nanotechnology.
(Ed.'s note: regular readers will understand that they're primarily talking about nanoscale materials (or what Ms. Peterson is calling "passive" nanomaterials) and not molecular manufacturing (what used to be called "nanotechnology") which presents it's own set of concerns. To learn more about molecular manufacturing, visit crnano.org.)
|Related News Press|
Preparing for Nano
Searching for a nanotech self-organizing principle May 1st, 2016
Nanotechnology is changing everything from medicine to self-healing buildings: Nanotechnology is so small it's measured in billionths of metres, and it is revolutionising every aspect of our lives April 2nd, 2016
Durnham University's DEEPEN project comes to a close September 26th, 2012
Chemical trickery corrals 'hyperactive' metal-oxide cluster December 8th, 2016
Infrared instrumentation leader secures exclusive use of Vantablack coating December 5th, 2016