- About Us
- Career Center
- Nano-Social Network
- Nano Consulting
- My Account
November 1st, 2011
Sometimes the seeming conflict between the overflowing optimism for nanotechnology and then the biting skepticism aimed at it creates confusion in its wake.
The skepticism surrounding nanotechnology in no small part stems from the belief—as Tim Harper points out—that a new iPhone app constitutes an emerging technology. When people confuse the next generation of an iPod with developing a material that will keep Moore's Law progressing for the next 25 years, there's likely to be some disappointment in nanotechnology.
Plus, isn't disappointment almost assured when it seems the overriding sentiment within capital markets is "Why bother with hard to understand, risky, expensive and long term stuff like nanotechnology when it only takes a couple of guys with a few laptops to create the next Facebook - and you'll know whether it will work in 18 months rather than 5 years."
|Related News Press|
News and information
Electric-car battery materials could harm key soil bacteria February 11th, 2016
Creating a color printer that uses a colorless, non-toxic ink inspired by nature February 11th, 2016
SLAC X-ray laser turns crystal imperfections into better images of important biomolecules: New method could remove major obstacles to studying structures of complex biological machines February 11th, 2016
Nanoparticle reduces targeted cancer drug's toxicity February 11th, 2016
Graphene-based Magnetoresistance Sensor 200 Times as Sensitive as Silicon November 1st, 2015
Can graphene make the world’s water clean? July 13th, 2015
Graphenea celebrates fifth anniversary April 27th, 2015
Graphene chips are close to significant commercialization October 1st, 2014
Chemical cages: New technique advances synthetic biology February 10th, 2016
A fast solidification process makes material crackle February 8th, 2016