- About Us
- Career Center
- Nano-Social Network
- Nano Consulting
- My Account
June 4th, 2007
Regulating nanotechnology - incremental approach or new regulatory framework?
In 2005, the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies released a report by Dr. J. Clarence Davies (Managing the effects of nanotechnology; pdf download, 1 MB) that found that U.S. legislation was inadequate. Davies concluded that nanotechnology is difficult to address using existing regulations and a new regulatory framework was needed in order to take the unique properties and risks of nanomaterials into account. This was in somewhat contradiction to what the EU Commission had found after its preliminary risk assessment workshop in 2004. The European Commission concluded that the European Union could protect health and environment by using an incremental approach and adapt existing legislation. Although there are cultural and legal differences between the EU and U.S., some people had a hard time understanding how the conclusions of the two reports could be so different. Among them, a group of scientists in Denmark and Italy decided to take a very product-specific approach and analyze the existing legislation along the life-cycle of three different commercially available products containing nanomaterials. They conclude that the 'incremental approach' could work effectively, provided due explanations and amendments are taken where necessary.
|Related News Press|
Unusual quantum liquid on crystal surface could inspire future electronics October 22nd, 2016
Nanoparticle vaccinates mice against dengue fever October 21st, 2016
Interviews/Book Reviews/Essays/Reports/Podcasts/Journals/White papers
Nanoantenna lighting-rod effect produces fast optical switches October 24th, 2016
New nanomedicine approach aims to improve HIV drug therapies October 24th, 2016
Study finds surface texture of gallium nitride affects cell behavior October 17th, 2016
10 years of SAFENANO at the IOM October 10th, 2016